Lusha\'s Chrome extension is genuinely fast for one-off LinkedIn lookups, and 1,643 G2 reviews put it at 4.3 stars. But credits get burned even when emails bounce, coverage drops outside US and UK, and unused annual credits reset to zero at year end.
FullEnrich takes a different approach. Every lookup runs through 20+ data providers in a waterfall, you only pay credits on verified hits, and credits roll over for 12 months on annual plans.
The fundamental difference is structural. Lusha owns a 280-million-contact database. FullEnrich queries 20+ data providers per request. Everything else on this page flows from that single architectural choice.
Lusha wins where speed beats coverage. The Chrome extension is the fastest in the category, the brand is well-known, and a new SDR is productive on day one. For one rep clicking through LinkedIn profiles, it's the right tool.
FullEnrich wins on cost-per-verified-contact. Each lookup runs through 20+ providers in waterfall, charges only on verified hits, and holds up in regions where Lusha's coverage thins out. Failed lookups cost nothing, and unlimited users come with every plan.
Based on verified G2 reviews, Reddit feedback, and conversations with teams who've made the move.
Lusha is a single proprietary database. When a contact is not in it, you get nothing back, but the credit is still consumed. FullEnrich queries 20+ data providers in waterfall and only charges credits when one returns a verified email or phone.
Lusha charges per seat after a 1-3 user starting cap. Pro is $52.45/mo for 3 seats. To get 6 seats you need Premium ($299.95/mo). FullEnrich is unlimited users on every plan, including the $29/mo Start tier.
Lusha owns a 280M-contact database that EU citizens regularly discover their data inside without prior notification. France CNIL issued a formal warning in 2020. FullEnrich fetches on-demand with a 3-month cache and never persists contact data as a queryable bank.
Real features. Real prices. We show where Lusha wins, too.
FullEnrich does not own a contact database. Each time you submit a name and company, the platform fans the request out to 20+ data providers in parallel (Datagma, Dropcontact, Hunter, Apollo, Prospeo, and more), runs triple email verification including catch-all detection, and returns the first verified hit. Results are cached for 3 months to avoid repeat charges, then discarded. Nothing is persistently stored as a queryable database.
Lusha owns a 280-million-contact proprietary database: 152M emails and 280M direct-dial phones. The data comes from a community contribution program, third-party brokers and licensed business directories, public sources, an internal pattern-inference algorithm, and LinkedIn profile reads via the Chrome extension. Lusha refreshes daily, holds end-user data for up to 3 years following last activity, and offers a public opt-out portal.
The architectural choice has compliance, accuracy, and pricing consequences. Lusha's depth is unmatched for ad-hoc lookups in US and UK mid-market, especially via the Chrome extension. FullEnrich's fan-out architecture means coverage stacks across regions where any single source thins out, and EU contacts aren't sitting in a queryable bank waiting to be discovered.
We are transparent about where Lusha wins, and where waterfall enrichment is the smarter choice.
For an individual SDR doing manual LinkedIn prospecting, Lusha's Chrome extension is the fastest tool in the category. New reps can be productive in minutes. Lusha also has more compliance certifications listed (ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 31700, SOC 2 Type II, TRUSTe Responsible AI) and ships native conversation intelligence.
If your workflow is one rep plus manual LinkedIn prospecting plus native conversation intelligence in one tool, choose Lusha. Or pick a dedicated platform like Apollo for a fuller GTM stack.
When you scale beyond one rep doing manual LinkedIn clicks, the math changes. FullEnrich is unlimited users on every plan, queries 20+ data providers per lookup, and only charges credits when a verified email or phone is actually returned. Credits roll over for 12 months on annual.
On average, FullEnrich finds 35% more contacts than single-source providers. Teams switch and stop paying for data they can't use.
Guideflow achieved 37% pipeline growth after switching to waterfall enrichment.
Real reviews from the last six months. Not marketing copy.
Here's who each is actually built for.
Learn why querying 20+ data providers finds contacts that Lusha's single database misses, and how teams cut their enrichment cost while improving accuracy.