Lusha's Chrome extension is fast. But when credits run out and coverage drops, teams look for more. FullEnrich queries 20+ providers per contact. No per-seat pricing. No monthly credit expiration.
Based on verified G2 reviews from Lusha users.
"The contact information provided by Lusha was incorrect 50% of the time in the US and the European Market."Ananthu S. — G2, 2★, Dec 2025
"Limited Credits" and "Expensive" each appear in 27 separate G2 reviews — tied for the two most common Lusha complaints. Phone reveals cost 10 credits vs 1 for emails.G2 review analysis, 2026
"I don't use Lusha — they're just selling my data against my will. I didn't consent to giving my contact details and they've attached it to someone else with the same name."Jack S. — G2, 1★, Oct 2025
"We've tried ZoomInfo, Apollo, Lusha, and others. They aren't bad. However, FullEnrich beats all of them when you want to find the emails and phone numbers of prospects. The best part is that we actually saved money."Thomas Rebaud — ex CEO at Meero (Series C), Investor in 32 startups
Every cell describes a real difference. We show where Lusha wins too.
50 free credits. No card. No per-seat fees.
Lusha uses a single proprietary database. When a contact isn't in it, you burn a credit and get nothing.
FullEnrich queries 20+ providers sequentially. One credit covers the entire waterfall. Result: 89% vs ~70% email find rates.
For a 1,000-contact list, that's 190 more verified contacts.
Lusha charges per user. FullEnrich charges per result. The math changes fast as your team grows.
5-person team: FullEnrich $29/mo total vs Lusha $112/mo (Pro) or $262/mo (Premium)
Lusha's LinkedIn Chrome extension is their strongest feature. One click on a profile, instant contact details.
FullEnrich removed its extension in June 2024 when LinkedIn restricted third-party tools. Enrichment happens via CSV, API, List Builder, or Clay/Zapier/Make.
If in-browser LinkedIn enrichment is critical, Lusha has the edge.
If you live in LinkedIn, Lusha wins.
If you enrich in bulk via CSV, API, or Clay, FullEnrich's coverage wins.
"FullEnrich uses multiple data sources and does a better job than the other tools we have purchased in the past."G2 Verified Review
"FullEnrich is legit! I was able to find emails now for 94% of all the contact leads Apollo found."Homepage testimonial
"5-person team on Lusha Premium = $262/mo. Same team on FullEnrich = $29/mo."Pricing comparison
Enrich 50 contacts free. Compare find rates side by side.
Verified reviews, last 6 months.
"The contact information provided by Lusha was incorrect 50% of the time in the US and the European Market."Ananthu S. — Dec 2025
"After using Cognism, ZoomInfo, and many others, FullEnrich is by far the best enrichment tool on the market."FullEnrich.com homepage
"They're just selling my data against my will. I didn't consent to giving my contact details and they've attached it to someone else."Jack S. — Oct 2025
"The data is not always reliable or relevant, not that smooth, takes time to load."rhicha s. — Oct 2025
"It has a bug where your search just starts freaking out. It isn't optimized for all use cases."Eric N. — Dec 2025
"FullEnrich uses multiple data sources and does a better job than LeadIQ and Hunter."G2 Verified Review
For coverage and accuracy, yes. FullEnrich finds 89% of US emails vs Lusha's ~70%. For LinkedIn browser enrichment, Lusha has the better extension.
Lusha charges per user: $22.45/user/mo (Pro) or $52.45/user/mo (Premium) on annual billing. 5-person team on Premium = $262/mo. FullEnrich is $29/mo total for unlimited users.
Yes, if your main need is verified emails and phones at scale. You'd adapt from browser-based to CSV/API/Clay-based enrichment since FullEnrich has no Chrome extension.
No. Removed June 2024 due to LinkedIn restrictions. Enrichment via CSV, API, List Builder, or Clay/Zapier/Make. If in-browser LinkedIn enrichment is critical, Lusha or Kaspr still offer extensions.
Lusha increased phone reveals from 5 to 10 credits. Makes phone-heavy outbound more expensive. FullEnrich also charges 10 credits per phone, but with unlimited users and credit rollover.
Varies. A G2 reviewer said Lusha data was "incorrect 50% of the time in the US and European Market" (2★, Dec 2025). FullEnrich's waterfall mitigates this by checking 20+ providers per contact.
Yes. Scale plan has a hidden fair-use cap. Users report throttling at 2,000-5,000 contacts/month/seat. FullEnrich's credit system is transparent — no hidden caps.
Both: 1 credit/email, 10 credits/phone. Difference: FullEnrich rolls over (3 months monthly, 12 months annual). Lusha resets monthly — unused credits lost.
Early Access. Use API, Zapier, or Make for now. Lusha has a more mature Salesforce connector today.
Claims GDPR/CCPA compliance, but community-sourced data model drew scrutiny. A 1★ G2 review: "selling my data against my will...I didn't consent." FullEnrich fetches on-demand from compliant providers, stores nothing. SOC 2 Type II certified.
FullEnrich. EMEA: 84% email, 71% phone via European-optimized waterfall. Lusha's coverage "drops significantly in continental Europe" per G2 reviews.
Yes, on Scale plan only (custom pricing, Bombora-powered). FullEnrich doesn't offer intent data.
Approach: FullEnrich queries 20+ providers per contact (waterfall). Lusha is a single-source database with a Chrome extension. FullEnrich wins on coverage + team economics. Lusha wins on ease-of-use for solo LinkedIn prospectors.
20+ data sources. 89% email find rates. Unlimited users. Starting at $29/mo total.